Case 4103512/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Member L Brown Tribunal Member T Lithgow Mr B McTague v The Scottish Ministers — 2025
- Case reference
- 4103512/2023
- Decision date
- 9 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones Tribunal
- Panel members
- L Brown, T Lithgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Member L Brown Tribunal Member T Lithgow Mr B McTague
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent dismissed the claimants for conduct after a prisoner alleged that they had used inappropriate force in a cell and failed to report it. Conduct was accepted as a potentially fair reason, but the tribunal held that the investigation and decision-making process were not fair in the circumstances.
The tribunal found material defects in the investigation, including reliance on unsigned witness statements, failure to analyse inconsistencies in the prisoner's accounts, failure to test the medical and CCTV evidence against alternative explanations, and failure to explain why evidence from other officers was accepted for some purposes but not in relation to the claimants. It also found that the allegation remained vague and that the decision maker did not have reasonable grounds for believing the claimants had committed the alleged misconduct.
The dismissal was held to be unfair. The tribunal rejected a Polkey reduction but found that the claimants contributed to the disciplinary proceedings by failing to make a timely report of the prisoner's conduct and their interaction in the cell, applying a 20% reduction to compensation. For Mr McTague, the tribunal ordered reinstatement from 5 January 2026 and awarded £24,061 net for loss of earnings between dismissal and reinstatement.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Mr McTague was ordered to be reinstated to the role of Residential Officer from 5 January 2026, with benefits restored, and awarded compensation for loss of earnings between dismissal and reinstatement. The tribunal applied a 20% reduction for contributory conduct. | Upheld | — | £24,061 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £24,061
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £24,061
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
9 references- s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
- Burchell test
- Shrestha v Genesis Housing Association Ltd
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust v Roldan
- Sharkey v Lloyds Bank plc
- Polkey
- s.123(6) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.