Case 4103515/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Nykiel v Mulroy Civil Engineering Scotland Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4103515/2020
- Decision date
- 16 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Nykiel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr P Nykiel began work for Mulroy Civil Engineering Scotland Ltd on 1 March 2014 as a Groundworker. He earned £468 gross per week, with net weekly take-home pay of £367. On 23 March 2020 he attended work as normal, but the following day he was told to stay at home because there was no work available. About a week later he received a letter saying the company had had to close down because there was no work available, together with a P45.
The tribunal accepted that the reason for dismissal was redundancy, which it treated as a potentially fair reason within section 98(2)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996. It noted that all employees were made redundant at the same time because the company was closing, so there was no issue about selection for redundancy. Although the respondent had not warned or consulted the claimant about redundancy, the tribunal found that warning and consultation would have been "utterly useless" or "futile" in the circumstances because the business had no work and was closing.
For that reason, the unfair dismissal claim failed and the tribunal held that the dismissal was fair. The tribunal then found that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment under section 135 Employment Rights Act 1996 because he had been dismissed by reason of redundancy. It calculated that payment at £4,212, being 9 weeks at £468 gross per week.
The tribunal also awarded 6 days' holiday pay for accrued but untaken leave before termination, which the claimant had calculated at £480. The judgment therefore records total monetary awards of £4,212 for redundancy payment and £480 for holiday pay, with no separate award for unfair dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal fair because the respondent had closed the business and all employees were made redundant at the same time; although there had been no warning or consultation, the judge accepted that warning and consultation would have been futile in the circumstances. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment under section 135 Employment Rights Act 1996 and calculated it at 9 weeks x £468 gross per week. | Upheld | — | £4,212 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded 6 days holiday pay for accrued but untaken leave before termination. | Upheld | — | £480 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,692
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 98(2)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 135 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.