Case 4103517/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103517/2020 Ms S Thomson v Primary Out of School Care — 2020
- Case reference
- 4103517/2020
- Decision date
- 9 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103517/2020 Ms S Thomson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment with no response from the respondent. The Employment Judge granted the claimant's application to amend the claim so that it included a complaint about payment of notice.
The tribunal held that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay £284, stated to be 3 x £94.73 net per week.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £284, stated to be 3 x £94.73 gross per week. The total monetary award on the face of the judgment was therefore £568.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal granted an amendment to add a complaint about payment of notice and held the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice, awarding £284, described as 3 x £94.73 net per week. | Upheld | — | £284 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £284, described as 3 x £94.73 gross per week. | Upheld | — | £284 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £568
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.