Case 4103518/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103518/2020 Ms S McNeil v Primary Out of School Care — 2020
- Case reference
- 4103518/2020
- Decision date
- 9 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103518/2020 Ms S McNeil
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21. The judge granted the claimant’s application to amend the claim to include a complaint about payment of notice.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay £1,935, described as 15 weeks in circumstances where 2 weeks’ notice had been paid at £129 net per week. The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy.
On that redundancy finding, the tribunal awarded a redundancy payment of £2,902, calculated as 22.5 x £129 gross per week. The judgment records no other remedy component beyond those two monetary orders.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal granted an amendment to add a complaint about notice pay and found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The order states £1,935, calculated as 15 weeks less 2 weeks already paid at £129 net per week. | Upheld | — | £1,935 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. The award was £2,902, calculated as 22.5 x £129 gross per week. | Upheld | — | £2,902 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,837
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.