Case 4103520/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103520/2020 Ms A Magee v Primary Out of School Care — 2020
- Case reference
- 4103520/2020
- Decision date
- 9 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103520/2020 Ms A Magee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented, so the Employment Judge issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The claimant, Ms A Magee, was allowed to amend the claim to include a complaint about payment of notice.
The tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered the respondent, Primary Out of School Care, to pay £2,265, calculated as 15 weeks' notice at £151 per week less the 2 weeks' notice already paid.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,850, calculated as 25.5 weeks at £151 gross per week. The judgment records a total monetary outcome of £6,115.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claimant was granted permission to amend the claim to include a complaint about payment of notice. The tribunal held the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered payment of £2,265, calculated as 15 weeks less the 2 weeks' notice already paid at £151 per week. | Upheld | — | £2,265 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,850, calculated as 25.5 x £151 gross per week. | Upheld | — | £3,850 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,115
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.