Case 4103521/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103521/2020 Ms N Figures v Primary Out of School Care — 2020
- Case reference
- 4103521/2020
- Decision date
- 9 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103521/2020 Ms N Figures
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman decided the case without a hearing and recorded that the claimant, Ms N Figures, had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The respondent was ordered to pay £1,625, calculated by reference to 13 weeks at £125 net per week, after taking account of 2 weeks' notice already paid.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. That award was fixed at £1,750, calculated as 14 x £125 gross per week. The total monetary award on the face of the judgment was therefore £3,375.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered payment of £1,625, calculated as 13 weeks at £125 net per week, with 2 weeks' notice already paid. | Upheld | — | £1,625 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,750, calculated as 14 x £125 gross per week. | Upheld | — | £1,750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,375
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.