Case 4103523/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Graham Epworth v Represented by Ms K Athanasiou - Lay Representative Brady Transport Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4103523/2023
- Decision date
- 16 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Graham Epworth
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe final hearing took place at Glasgow via Cloud Video Platform on 12 October 2023 before Employment Judge R McPherson. The respondent was not present, was not represented, and had lodged no ET3. The tribunal orally gave reasons at the hearing, with no written reasons requested.
The claimant's claims for unpaid holiday pay, unlawful deduction of wages, and unpaid notice pay all succeeded. The tribunal awarded £1,710 gross for unpaid holiday pay, £6,855 gross for unlawful deduction of wages, and £855 gross for unpaid notice pay, each expressed gross of tax and national insurance.
The tribunal also made an award of £1,710 under s38 of the Employment Act 2002 in respect of the respondent's failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. The awards together total £11,130 gross.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay succeeded; award expressed gross of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,710 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deduction of wages succeeded; award expressed gross of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £6,855 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for unpaid notice pay succeeded; award expressed gross of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £855 |
| Other | Award made in respect of the respondent's failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars, in terms of s38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,710 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,130
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s38 of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.