Case 4103537/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103537/2023 (V) Held at Aberdeen on November 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mrs Euphemia Vinga
Mrs Euphemia Vinga brought a race discrimination claim arising from her employment with Barchester Healthcare Ltd as a registered nurse at Moray View House, Stoneyfield, Inverness. She resigned on 21 October 2022, with an effective date of termination of 21 November 2022. The tribunal recorded that she later became aware, on or about 15 March 2023, that the respondent had reported her to the Disclosure and Barring Service, after which she sought advice and early conciliation was started on 5 May 2023; the ACAS certificate issued on 6 June 2023 and the ET1 was presented on 3 July 2023.
The tribunal treated the pre-termination allegations as distinct acts rather than a continuing act of discrimination. It relied on the timing of the events and the involvement of different individuals, including the gap between the 20 October 2022 meeting complaint and the later January 2023 complaints, and referred to Aziz v FDA. It found that the only complaint that was timeous on the primary limitation period was the DBS referral on 15 March 2023.
The claimant asked for the pre-termination complaints to be allowed out of time, but the tribunal refused to extend time on a just and equitable basis. It considered the guidance in British Coal Corporation v Keeble & Others, Adedeji v University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, and Robertson v Bexley Community Centre t/a Leisure Link. In doing so it took account of prejudice, the length of delay, the claimant's conduct, and the cogency of evidence if matters from October 2022 were heard at a final hearing. It noted that the claimant said she did not know about the three-month time limit until March 2023, but also found that she had believed she had been racially discriminated against in October 2022 and had taken no steps for some months to investigate bringing a claim.
For the post-termination complaints, the tribunal relied on section 108 of the Equality Act 2010, which covers discrimination and harassment after employment has ended. It held that the refusal of a reference on or about 6 January 2023 and the NMC referral on or about 19 January 2023 were out of time, but it was just and equitable to extend time for both. The DBS referral was within time. The judgment records that the tribunal had jurisdiction to consider only those three post-termination complaints; it did not determine the merits of any of them.
This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Complaint about the telephone call on 17 October 2022 inviting the claimant to a meeting on 20 October 2022 and not advising that it was an investigation meeting. The tribunal held this pre-termination complaint was out of time and dismissed it for want of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Complaint about the meeting on 20 October 2022, which included allegations of direct discrimination, victimisation and harassment. The tribunal held this pre-termination complaint was out of time and dismissed it for want of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Complaint about the respondent's refusal to provide a reference on or about 6 January 2023. The tribunal held it was just and equitable to extend time and that it had jurisdiction to consider the complaint, but made no merits finding. | Other | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Complaint about the respondent's referral of the claimant to the Nursing & Midwifery Council on or about 19 January 2023. The tribunal held it was just and equitable to extend time and that it had jurisdiction to consider the complaint, but made no merits finding. | Other | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Complaint about the respondent's referral of the claimant to the Disclosure and Barring Service on 15 March 2023. The tribunal held this complaint was timeous and that it had jurisdiction to consider it, but made no merits finding. | Other | Race | — |
The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.