Case 4103547/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Kenneth Allan v The Stein Inn Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103547/2020
- Decision date
- 11 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B. Beyzade
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Kenneth Allan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered separate claims by Mr Kenneth Allan and Mrs Hazel Morgan for unauthorised deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It found that both were employed on salary, that their March 2020 pay was not dependent on the amount of work carried out, and that each had agreed to furlough from 23 March 2020 to 31 March 2020, with furlough pay later paid in April 2020.
For Mr Allan, the tribunal found that he should have been paid his full salary for the 16 normal working days between 1 March 2020 and 22 March 2020, amounting to £1,538.40 gross, but that he was only paid £1,237.91 gross. That meant an underpayment of £300.49 gross, which the tribunal held was not authorised by statute, contract, or written consent and therefore amounted to an unauthorised deduction. For Mrs Morgan, the tribunal found that her salary for the same period should have been £1,600.00 gross, but that she was only paid £891.58 gross, producing an underpayment of £708.42 gross on the same basis.
Although the tribunal accepted that the deductions were unauthorised, it also found that in November 2020 the respondent made an open offer of £500 to each claimant and that the settlement correspondence showed offer and acceptance. It held that the £500 paid to each claimant was a legally binding settlement agreed by both claimants and accepted in full and final settlement of their claims. On that basis, and alternatively by giving credit for the settlement sum, no money remained due to either claimant and both claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | First claimant. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction in March 2020 of £300.49 gross, but held that the £500 payment made in November 2020 was a legally binding full and final settlement, so no sum remained due and the claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Second claimant. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction in March 2020 of £708.42 gross, but held that the £500 payment made in November 2020 was a legally binding full and final settlement, so no sum remained due and the claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 27(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- sections 13 and 13A Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 230 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.