Case 4103558/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4103558/2023 Mrs S Russell v Pass Drive Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4103558/2023
- Decision date
- 18 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sangster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4103558/2023 Mrs S Russell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, the Employment Judge found that Pass Drive Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs S Russell's wages for April 2023.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,837.52 gross. It also recorded that the respondent could deduct any income tax and employee National Insurance contributions required by law before payment, provided it remitted those sums to HMRC and gave the claimant written evidence of the deductions and remittance.
The hearing listed for 14 September 2023 was cancelled. The judgment does not record any additional claim types, legal tests, or separate remedy components beyond the wage award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages for April 2023 and ordered payment of £1,837.52 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,838 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,838
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,838
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.