Case 4103611/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103611/2020 Miss C Richardson v Oceanic Studios/National Campaigns Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4103611/2020
- Decision date
- 1 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103611/2020 Miss C Richardson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge F Eccles gave judgment on 1 September 2020 and entered it the same day. The respondent was named as Oceanic Studios/National Campaigns Limited and the claimant was Miss C Richardson.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £184. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £312 as damages for that breach.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £640. The judgment does not record any separate legal tests, interest, or split remedy beyond the three stated sums.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £184 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as damages in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £312 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £640 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,136
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.