Case 4103629/2020 · Employment Tribunal
ETZ 4(WR) IN THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL (SCOTLAND) AT EDINBURGH Judgment of the Employment Tribunal in Case No: 4103629/2020 (A) Issued Following Undefended Final Hearing Conducted at Edinburgh on the th of January 2021 by Telephone Conference Employment Judge J G d’Inverno Miss R Ingham v The Retreat and Wellbeing (Linlithgow) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4103629/2020
- Decision date
- 12 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joseph
Parties
2 namedClaimant
ETZ 4(WR) IN THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL (SCOTLAND) AT EDINBURGH Judgment of the Employment Tribunal in Case No: 4103629/2020 (A) Issued Following Undefended Final Hearing Conducted at Edinburgh on the th of January 2021 by Telephone Conference Employment Judge J G d’Inverno Miss R Ingham
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the undefended final hearing on 11 January 2021, the tribunal found that Miss R Ingham was dismissed by the respondent for reason of redundancy, with an effective date of termination of 16 March 2020. The respondent did not appear or take part. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's date of birth was 10 October 1997, that her employment began on 10 October 2013, and that her gross weekly wage was £314.
On those facts, the tribunal found that as at the effective date of termination the claimant was 22 years old and had accrued six complete years of service. It held that she was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment calculated on the basis of one half of her gross weekly wage for each completed year of service under the age of 22. The payment was calculated as 6 weeks at half of £314, namely 6 x £157, producing a statutory redundancy payment of £942. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay that sum to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £942 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £942
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.