Case 4103634/2020 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103634/2020 Mr K McKaig v Represented by: Mrs J Rawlings Stirling District Citizens Advice Bureau Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4103634/2020
- Decision date
- 29 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103634/2020 Mr K McKaig
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment of Employment Judge Ian McFatridge, dated 29 September 2020, records that Mr K McKaig withdrew the breach of contract head of claim against Stirling District Citizens Advice Bureau Ltd. The tribunal therefore dismissed that head of claim under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings on the merits of any claim are set out in the extracted text, and no monetary award is recorded. The decision is confined to the procedural disposal of the withdrawn breach of contract claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract head of claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.