Case 4103651/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. L Porter v Mr. B. McLaughlin (Rep.) (1) The Vault Management Group Ltd. — 2024
- Case reference
- 4103651/2023
- Decision date
- 25 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tinnion
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. L Porter
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing in Glasgow on 24 October 2024, Employment Judge Tinnion dealt only with the disposal of the claims against the named respondents. The judgment records that the Claimant’s claim against the 2nd Respondent, Ms. A. McAllister, was dismissed on withdrawal.
The judgment also records that, by consent, the Claimant’s claim against the 1st Respondent, The Vault Management Group Ltd., was dismissed because that company had been struck off the Register of Companies on 26 December 2023 and dissolved on 2 January 2024. No substantive liability findings, legal analysis, or monetary award are set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim against the 2nd Respondent, Ms. A. McAllister, was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | By consent, the claim against the 1st Respondent, The Vault Management Group Ltd., was dismissed after the company had been struck off the Register of Companies on 26 December 2023 and dissolved on 2 January 2024. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.