Case 4103658/2019 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4103658/2019 Mr O Lafferty v Tesco Maintenance Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103658/2019
- Decision date
- 1 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4103658/2019 Mr O Lafferty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr O Lafferty brought proceedings against Tesco Maintenance Limited in Employment Tribunals (Scotland) case 4103658/2019. The judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claim before determination on the merits.
Employment Judge Ian McFatridge therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No findings of fact on the substantive dispute are recorded in the extracted text.
The judgment does not record any award of compensation or other remedy, and no split between individual heads of claim is given in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. The extracted text does not specify the underlying cause(s) of action. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.