Case 4103658/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Ashleigh Foggo st v Redeem UK Limited (In Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 4103658/2020
- Decision date
- 3 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Ashleigh Foggo st
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal held that the claimants' complaints that Redeem UK Ltd (in Administration) had failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 were well-founded. It therefore made a protective award under section 189 in respect of both claimants, Ashleigh Foggo and Barry McAloon.
The judgment orders the respondent to pay remuneration for the protected period from 7 July 2020 to 5 October 2020, a period of 90 days. The written record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing, but it does not set out any separate monetary sum beyond the order for payment for the protected period.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements; the judgment applies to both claimants, Ashleigh Foggo and Barry McAloon. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 188 TULRCA 1992
- section 189 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.