Case 4103660/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Brooke Shanks v Heat Source Solutions Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103660/2019
- Decision date
- 15 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rory McPherson
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Brooke Shanks
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Brooke Shanks worked for Heat Source Solutions Ltd from 26 February 2018 to 9 February 2019 as the Design Technician at the respondent's Clerwood showroom. The respondent did not appear at the final hearing. The tribunal found that she had not been given written terms and conditions, had not been issued with wage slips, had not been offered a pension scheme or employer contributions, and had not been paid on time in several months. It also found that she had 3 days of accrued untaken holiday when she resigned.
On the contractual and pay claims, the tribunal awarded £1,246 for the failure to provide written terms of employment, noting that the claimant would have been entitled to 2 weeks' pay and that it was just and equitable to increase this to 4 weeks' pay. It awarded £311.50 for 7 days of unpaid wages, £311.50 for the failure to make the required pension contributions, and £133.50 for accrued holiday pay. The tribunal stated that there was no separate compensation provision for the failure to provide itemised pay statements. The total award under these heads was £2,002.50.
On age discrimination, the tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that in early December 2018 she was told a showroom supervisor would be recruited and that the reason given was that she was "only 21" and the job was "too much responsibility" for someone of her age. It held that this was less favourable treatment because of age, and that there was no evidence of a proportionate legitimate aim. The tribunal awarded £1,000 for injury to feelings, applying Vento and subsequent Presidential guidance.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars; the tribunal increased the award from 2 weeks' pay to 4 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £1,246 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Outstanding February 2019 wages for 7 days. | Upheld | — | £312 |
| Breach of contract | Failure to make the required employer pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £312 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken holiday on termination, assessed as 3 days. | Upheld | — | £134 |
| Age discrimination | In early December 2018 the claimant was told a showroom supervisor would be recruited because she was 'only 21' and the job was 'too much responsibility' for someone of her age; the tribunal awarded injury to feelings. | Upheld | Age | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,003
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police (No 2)
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
- reg 30 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.