Case 4103663/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Wilde v Denny Enterprises International Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103663/2019
- Decision date
- 7 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Wilde
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the claim on its merits. It issued an opportunity on 16 July 2019 for the claimant to provide written reasons by 22 July 2019, or to request a hearing, because the tribunal was concerned that the claim was not being actively pursued.
The reasons recorded that the claimant had failed to attend a hearing on 21 June 2019, had not completed a case management agenda, and had not complied with an order to explain his failure to attend by 1 July 2019. The claimant also did not reply to the 16 July 2019 letter.
As no acceptable reason was given and no hearing was requested, Employment Judge M Whitcombe struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action in the strike-out reasons; it refers only to 'the claim'. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.