Case 4103664/2020 · Employment Tribunal
the Union v Written Submissions Marmac Services Limited (in liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 4103664/2020
- Decision date
- 21 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns Unite
Parties
2 namedClaimant
the Union
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was Unite the Union, an independent trade union formally recognised by the respondent for collective bargaining for electrical apprentices, electrical engineers, apprentice plumbers, plumbers and administrative staff. The respondent entered liquidation proceedings on 29 May 2020 and dismissed all 45 employees by reason of redundancy on that date. An interim liquidator was appointed on 3 June 2020, and the Court later granted leave on 26 August 2020 for the proceedings to be brought or continued against the respondent.
The tribunal held that the respondent failed to consult with representatives of the affected employees in accordance with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It recorded that, where the failure relates to representatives of a trade union, the union has title to sue under section 189(1)(c) on behalf of all employees in respect of whom it is recognised, whether or not they are union members. The respondent did not defend the claim.
The tribunal found the claim well founded and made a protective award under section 189 in favour of all employees of the respondent who were made redundant on or within 90 days of 29 May 2020. It ordered the respondent to pay remuneration to the employees for a protected period of 30 days from 29 May 2020. The extracted judgment does not state a single aggregate monetary figure for the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award claim under sections 188 and 189 of TULRCA 1992. The tribunal made a protective award for the protected period of 30 days, but no single monetary total was stated in the judgment text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.189 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.