Case 4103668/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103668/2019 Mr M Harvie v Represented by: Mr G Robinson Scottish Ambulance Service — 2020
- Case reference
- 4103668/2019
- Decision date
- 28 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Hosie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103668/2019 Mr M Harvie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal record states that Mr M Harvie's claim against Scottish Ambulance Service was withdrawn by the claimant. No substantive findings were made on liability, and the judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action beyond the listing categories shown elsewhere on the case page.
The disposal recorded is that the claim was dismissed under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment is procedural only and contains no remedy award, no factual findings on the merits, and no legal test applied beyond the reference to Rule 52.
The judgment was signed by Employment Judge Nicol Hosie on 26 February 2020 and sent to the parties on 28 February 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive heads of claim. It states only that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.