Case 4103674/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103674/2019 Miss L Morley v Dunn’s Food And Drinks Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103674/2019
- Decision date
- 16 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103674/2019 Miss L Morley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented. On the available material, Employment Judge Robert Gall found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement.
The tribunal ordered Dunn’s Food And Drinks Limited to pay Miss L Morley £266.95. The judgment describes that sum as the balance of holiday and notice pay claimed. The hearing listed for 21 June 2019 was cancelled.
No separate findings are recorded on liability beyond the non-payment finding, and no breakdown is given between holiday pay and notice pay. The judgment does not record any additional remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal ordered payment of the sum of £266.95, described as the balance of holiday and notice pay claimed. The reasons given state that the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £267 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £267
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.