Case 4103678/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Dlamini v Adecco Corporate — 2022
- Case reference
- 4103678/2022
- Decision date
- 29 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R King
- Venue
- the Edinburgh Tribunal
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dlamini
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Dypsyl Dlamini, worked for Adecco Corporate at its Bathgate premises from 1 December 2021 until 13 June 2022, with his last day in work on 9 June 2022. He was paid £11.76 per hour gross and accrued holidays in hours based on a percentage of hours worked. The tribunal found that he accrued 105.51 hours of holiday, had taken 70 hours, and was therefore due 35.51 hours of holiday pay on termination, amounting to £417.60 gross.
The respondent paid £370.51 gross on termination, leaving an underpayment of £47.09. Applying section 13 and section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and taking account of regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, the tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence and held that the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was well founded. It ordered the respondent to pay the outstanding £47.09 gross, with the claimant to account to HMRC for any deductions properly due.
The claimant also said he suffered additional financial loss because his final salary, due on 24 June 2022, was not paid until 8 July 2022, resulting in a £24 landlord charge for late rent and a £20 bank charge. The tribunal did not accept that those losses were caused by the holiday-pay underpayment; on the balance of probabilities, they were due to the late payment of final salary and were not attributable to the matter complained of in these proceedings. No additional compensation was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal accepted that the claimant had been underpaid accrued holiday pay on termination: £417.60 gross was due, £370.51 gross had been paid, leaving £47.09 outstanding. The tribunal also rejected his claim for additional compensation for late-payment losses, finding those losses were attributable to the late payment of final salary rather than the holiday-pay underpayment. | Upheld | — | £47 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £47
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 24 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.