Case 4103699/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Murrell v Robertson Group Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4103699/2022
- Decision date
- 5 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Murrell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Murrell presented his claim on 2 July 2022 and ticked the unfair dismissal box on the claim form. His case was that he had been offered a contract, later told the offer had been withdrawn, and had not received written confirmation before the proposed start date. The tribunal issued a rule 27 notice raising the issue of jurisdiction because he did not appear to have qualifying service for an unfair dismissal claim.
At the hearing on 3 October 2022, the claimant accepted that he did not have the necessary period of service to pursue unfair dismissal. He argued that the claim form also encompassed breach of contract, relying on the narrative he had entered on the form. The respondent submitted that the form showed unfair dismissal only, that there had been a separate opportunity to indicate a breach of contract claim, and that it would not be fair to allow that point to be advanced at that stage.
The tribunal found that the claim before it was unfair dismissal only. It noted that the unfair dismissal box had been ticked and that the claimant's narrative described a withdrawn offer and an asserted termination of employment, which supported that characterisation. It therefore dismissed the claim because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to determine it without qualifying service. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the claim before it was one of unfair dismissal only. The claimant accepted at the hearing that he did not have the necessary qualifying service to pursue that claim. The tribunal rejected an attempt to read the form as including a breach of contract complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 27(1) Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
- rule 27(3) Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
- qualifying service for unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.