Case 4103702/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Macgregor v Represented by Ms A Bowman - Solicitor Bells Pub Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 4103702/2023
- Decision date
- 8 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sangster
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Macgregor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs G Macgregor succeeded in her claim under s23 ERA 1996 for unlawful deductions from wages. The tribunal held that £1,223.60 had been unlawfully deducted, comprising £608 for wages for hours worked in January 2023 due on 28 February 2023, £190 for wages for hours worked in February 2023, £304 for two weeks' holiday taken in February 2023, and £121.60 for payment in lieu of holiday entitlement due on termination. The order was for the gross sum, with the usual deduction for tax and employee national insurance if required by law.
The claimant also succeeded in wrongful dismissal. The tribunal found that 6 Bells Pub Group Limited dismissed her without the two weeks' notice required by contract, and awarded £304.00 net as damages for breach of contract. It further found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and had not received a statutory redundancy payment, so it ordered payment of £456.00.
The unfair dismissal claim also succeeded. The tribunal held that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy, but it awarded no compensation on that claim. In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to issue a written statement of particulars of employment under s1 ERA 1996. Because the claimant succeeded in claims within Schedule 5 of the Employment Act 2002 and no written particulars were provided, the tribunal awarded two weeks' pay capped at £571 per week, giving a further £304.00 under s38(3) of the Employment Act 2002. The total monetary sum ordered was £2,287.60.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Successful claim under s23 ERA 1996 for unlawful deductions from wages contrary to s13 ERA 1996, made up of unpaid January 2023 wages, February 2023 wages, unpaid holiday pay for two weeks in February 2023, and payment in lieu of holiday entitlement on termination. The order was for a gross sum of £1,223.60. | Upheld | — | £1,224 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed without the two weeks' notice required by contract and awarded £304.00 as damages for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £304 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and had not received a statutory redundancy payment. It ordered payment of £456.00. | Upheld | — | £456 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal was unfair and by reason of redundancy, but no compensation was awarded on this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent failed to give the claimant a written statement of particulars of employment as required by s1 ERA 1996. No separate sum was awarded for this finding, but it formed part of the basis for the s38(3) Employment Act 2002 award. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,288
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s23 ERA 1996
- s13 ERA 1996
- s1 ERA 1996
- s38(3) Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.