Case 4103731/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103731/2022 Miss C Bridger v AB Holdings (Schoolhill) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4103731/2022
- Decision date
- 12 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge G.I. McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103731/2022 Miss C Bridger
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found that Miss C Bridger had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and that she was entitled to a redundancy payment.
The judgment records the amount as £2,701.53, calculated from a weekly pay figure of £415.62 multiplied by 6.5 weeks. The hearing listed for 15 September 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment on the available material after no response was presented. The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,701.53, calculated as weekly pay of £415.62 multiplied by 6.5 weeks. | Upheld | — | £2,702 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,702
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.