Case 4103768/2025 · Employment Tribunal
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103768/2025 Hearing at Edinburgh on January 2026 Employment Judge: M A Macleod Inna Halian v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 4103768/2025
- Decision date
- 2 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
1 namedClaimant
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103768/2025 Hearing at Edinburgh on January 2026 Employment Judge: M A Macleod Inna Halian
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was listed at Edinburgh for 22 January 2026, and notices had been issued to the parties by email on 18 November 2025. The respondent attended and was represented by a lay representative, but the claimant did not attend by the scheduled start time.
The clerk telephoned the claimant, who said she could not understand English and asked for an email to be sent. No reply was received and no reason was given for non-attendance. On the respondent's application, the tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024, noting that the claimant could apply for reconsideration within 14 days if there was a good reason for her failure to attend.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismisses the claim under Rule 47 due to the claimant's non-attendance; it does not adjudicate the merits or give a claim-specific remedy. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismisses the claim under Rule 47 due to the claimant's non-attendance; it does not adjudicate the merits or give a claim-specific remedy. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment dismisses the claim under Rule 47 due to the claimant's non-attendance; it does not adjudicate the merits or give a claim-specific remedy. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The listing category refers to Written Pay Statement. The judgment dismisses the claim under Rule 47 due to the claimant's non-attendance and does not address the merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.