Case 4103794/2018 · Employment Tribunal
M Robison Mr P Marshall v O.C.O Glenrothes Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4103794/2018
- Decision date
- 14 May 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miss
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Robison Mr P Marshall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the respondent did not enter a response. The Employment Judge decided on the available material that liability could properly be determined without a hearing. The claimant's complaints of failure to pay redundancy pay, failure to pay holiday pay, and breach of contract in respect of notice pay all succeeded.
On remedy, the tribunal recorded £1,015 for redundancy pay based on service from December 2012, £134.40 for sixteen hours of unpaid holiday pay, and £1,015 for five weeks' notice pay. No separate award for interest, injury to feelings, or any other additional component was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claimant's complaint of failure to pay redundancy pay succeeded. The tribunal awarded £1,015 in respect of service from December 2012. | Upheld | — | £1,015 |
| Holiday pay | The claimant's complaint of failure to pay holiday pay succeeded. The tribunal awarded £134.40 for sixteen hours of unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £134 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant's breach of contract complaint, relating to notice pay, succeeded. The tribunal awarded £1,015 for five weeks' notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,015 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,164
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.