Case 4103800/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Bidwell v Cuckoos — 2020
- Case reference
- 4103800/2020
- Decision date
- 15 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Bidwell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Bidwell brought a claim on 20 July 2020 saying that his former employer had failed to pay him a tax rebate of about £446. He said he had been paid in cash, did not receive payslips, and only realised the issue when checking his tax affairs after his employment ended on 31 December 2019. He then tried to contact the respondent through Facebook, exchanged messages in April 2020, and later sought help from HMRC and the CAB.
The tribunal considered the time limit in s.23(2) and s.23(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and referred to Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser on the meaning of "not reasonably practicable". It accepted that, given the circumstances and the pandemic, it may not have been reasonably practicable for the claim to be presented by 30 March 2020, but held that the delay beyond that point was not reasonable.
The tribunal found that the claimant was aware by the end of April 2020 that his former employer had disengaged from contact, and that it would have been reasonable for him to raise proceedings soon after that. Because he did not present the claim until 20 July 2020, the tribunal concluded that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claim. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction under the three-month time limit in s.23 ERA 1996. The reasons contain an apparent date inconsistency at para 10, referring to April 2019, but the surrounding context indicates April 2020; the summary does not rely on that date. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.23(2) ERA 1996
- s.23(4) ERA 1996
- Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser
- not reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.