Case 4103810/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103810/2020 Ms M Agostini v R B MacGregor — 2020
- Case reference
- 4103810/2020
- Decision date
- 9 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103810/2020 Ms M Agostini
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. Under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman decided the case on the available material and found that the complaints of unfair dismissal and failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent, R B MacGregor, to pay £3,253.86 in respect of the unfair dismissal and £769.24 in respect of the failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. Those two sums total £4,023.10. The judgment contains no further breakdown of the award and identifies no lay members.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,254 |
| Other | The judgment awards this sum for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. It does not map neatly to a locked claim_type, so it is recorded as other. | Upheld | — | £769 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,023
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.