Case 4103815/2012 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M O'Donnell v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103815/2012
- Decision date
- 17 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr M O'Donnell
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 25 September 2018 the tribunal gave Mr O'Donnell an opportunity to provide written reasons by 2 October 2018 or to request a hearing to address why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, relying on rule 37(1)(d) that the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment records no substantive determination of liability and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The short judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action; this classification follows the case listing category 'Equal Pay Act'. The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.