Loading…

Ms P O’Neill v Jaeger Retail Limited HELD AT: Manchester — Employment Tribunal 2018 | Tribunal Watch

Case 4103815/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Ms P O’Neill v Jaeger Retail Limited HELD AT: Manchester — 2018

Case reference: 4103815/2018
Decision date: 17 October 2018
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Franey

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms P O’Neill

Respondent

Jaeger Retail Limited HELD AT: Manchester

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Franey sat alone at Manchester and gave an oral judgment dismissing Ms P O’Neill’s claim. The written record states that the claim was presented outside the time limit in section 123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010.

The tribunal also found that it was not just and equitable to extend time under section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010, so the claim was dismissed on limitation grounds without a merits determination. No remedy was awarded.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The written record does not identify the underlying discrimination ground(s) in the body of the judgment. The claim was dismissed because it was presented outside the time limit in section 123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010 and the tribunal was not satisfied that it was just and equitable to extend time under section 123(1)(b).	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.