Case 4103827/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103827/2020 Miss L Paterson v Web Rigging Services Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4103827/2020
- Decision date
- 7 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103827/2020 Miss L Paterson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued judgment under rule 21 on the available material. The judgment records that Miss L Paterson had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal ordered Web Rigging Services Ltd to pay damages of £3,553.85 for that breach.
The tribunal also found that Miss Paterson was dismissed by reason of redundancy and that she was entitled to a redundancy payment. The amount of the redundancy payment was assessed at £3,553.85. The judgment does not set out any further reasoning beyond those conclusions, and no additional legal issues, deductions, or discrimination claims are recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £3,553.85. | Upheld | — | £3,554 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,553.85. | Upheld | — | £3,554 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,108
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.