Case 4103828/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103828/2023 (V)5 Held at Aberdeen on October 2023 Employment Judge J M Hendry Miss A J Duncan v Bellus Tan & Beauty Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4103828/2023
- Decision date
- 21 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103828/2023 (V)5 Held at Aberdeen on October 2023 Employment Judge J M Hendry Miss A J Duncan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 4 October 2023, Employment Judge J M Hendry heard the claimant, Miss A J Duncan, in person. The respondent, Bellus Tan & Beauty Ltd, was not present or represented. For the reasons given orally at that hearing, the tribunal found that the claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay was well-founded. The judgment records that the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £695.40 as unlawfully withheld wages, subject to the usual deductions for income tax and employee National Insurance contributions if required by law. The tribunal also directed the respondent to provide a payslip showing the deductions submitted to HMRC.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that the claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay was well-founded and ordered payment of £695.40 as unlawfully withheld wages. | Upheld | — | £695 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £695
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.