Case 4103857/2018 · Employment Tribunal
M Robison Miss L Gormal v Kommando Marketing — 2018
- Case reference
- 4103857/2018
- Decision date
- 27 June 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ms
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Robison Miss L Gormal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss L Gormal, brought a claim against Kommando Marketing for unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The case was heard at Glasgow before Employment Judge Ms M Robison, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by its director, Mr M Evans.
The tribunal upheld the claim. It found that the respondent should pay £882.07 in respect of arrears of pay for the period from 1 to 15 February 2018, £284.70 in respect of unpaid holiday pay, and £103.81 in respect of unpaid expenses.
The judgment was issued orally with reasons on 20 June 2018 and entered in the register on 27 June 2018. No other claims or remedies are recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £882.07 for arrears of pay for 1 to 15 February 2018, £284.70 for unpaid holiday pay, and £103.81 for unpaid expenses. | Upheld | — | £1,271 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,271
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.