Case 4103876/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Puges Casquero v Represented by:- Miss Del Valle Pedros Black Moon Events Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4103876/2018
- Decision date
- 15 January 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Cowen
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Puges Casquero
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant and respondent had an employment contract arising from an oral offer of work made by Sebastian Makasewicz on 11 August 2017. Applying Ready-Mixed Concrete and Carmichael, it held that the claimant provided personal service, the respondent exercised sufficient control, and there was mutuality of obligation. The contract was found to be for 46 hours per week, subject to agreed variation, and the claimant was not on a zero-hours contract. The tribunal accepted the claimant and Mr Palacios on the rota and pay arrangements, and did not accept the respondent's contrary account where it was inconsistent.
The tribunal found that the respondent agreed to pay the claimant for additional holiday between 28 December 2017 and 15 January 2018 after he agreed to train chefs at the Night Cap. It held that the failure to pay for that period was an unlawful deduction from wages and awarded £924.14. It also found that, at termination, the claimant had accrued but untaken holiday under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and was owed £154.02.
The tribunal further found that from 16 January 2018 the respondent told the claimant there was no further work and no new work was then offered, which it treated as a failure to pay him for the period to his resignation on 23 April 2018. It awarded £5,313.82, calculated as 13.8 weeks of net earnings at £385.06 per week. The tribunal also found a breach of section 1 ERA 1996 because written particulars were never provided despite being requested, and made an award of £770.12 under section 38(3)(b) Employment Act 2002.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Holiday pay agreed for additional holiday from 28 December 2017 to 15 January 2018; the tribunal found this unpaid period was an unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £924 |
| Working time regulations | Accrued but untaken holiday on termination; award made under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £154 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found no zero-hours contract and held the respondent stopped providing work from 16 January 2018 to 23 April 2018; the judgment also described the resulting non-payment as an unlawful deduction of wages under s.13 ERA 1996. The award was calculated as 13.8 weeks of net earnings. | Upheld | — | £5,314 |
| Other | Award for failure to provide written particulars under s.1 ERA 1996, made under s.38(3)(b) Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £770 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,162
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £5,314
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
6 references- Ready-Mixed Concrete test
- Carmichael mutuality of obligation
- s.13 ERA 1996
- regulation 4 Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.1 ERA 1996
- s.38(3) Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.