Case 4103880/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103880/2018 Hearing at Glasgow on April 2019 Employment Judge: M A Macleod (sitting alone) Miss M C Aitken v Represented by Ms C Shirkie Campbell Inns Ltd t/a The Dumfries Arms Hotel — 2019
- Case reference
- 4103880/2018
- Decision date
- 3 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mary Kearns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103880/2018 Hearing at Glasgow on April 2019 Employment Judge: M A Macleod (sitting alone) Miss M C Aitken
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss M C Aitken had brought constructive dismissal and disability discrimination claims against Campbell Inns Ltd t/a The Dumfries Arms Hotel. On 17 August 2018 she wrote to the Tribunal withdrawing her claims, and the Tribunal then issued a Rule 52 dismissal. The present judgment was not on the merits of those claims but on the respondent's application for expenses under Rule 76 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The respondent argued that the claims had no reasonable prospect of success, relying on the absence of evidence that the claimant met the section 6 Equality Act 2010 definition of disability and on the short-service issue in relation to constructive dismissal. The Tribunal held that it would be unjust to conclude, on the written material alone, that the claims had no reasonable prospect of success, because the claimant's own evidence had not been heard and the constructive dismissal issue had been deferred by the earlier preliminary hearing.
The respondent also said that the late withdrawal of the claim was vexatious, disruptive or otherwise unreasonable. The Tribunal accepted that the claimant had been anxious and unwell, had sought a postponement on 17 August 2018, and had then withdrawn when that request was refused. It found that her conduct fell short of the Rule 76 threshold, and refused the respondent's expenses application. No expenses award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Withdrawn by the claimant on 17 August 2018; the Tribunal then issued a dismissal under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. In the expenses judgment, the Tribunal noted that the jurisdiction/service issue had been deferred by the earlier preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Withdrawn by the claimant on 17 August 2018; the Tribunal then issued a dismissal under Rule 52. The disability status issue had been listed for a preliminary hearing on 20 and 21 August 2018. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 76 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 52 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.