Case 4103914/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Liz Jacob v National Advertising Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 4103914/2025
- Decision date
- 30 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Liz Jacob
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 22 judgment in which no response was presented by the respondent, National Advertising Ltd, and Employment Judge D Hoey decided the claim on the available material. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £2,757.32 gross.
The tribunal also found that Mrs J Liz Jacob was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £500.00 gross for that claim. No other claims, legal tests, or further findings are recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 22 judgment issued on the available material after no response was presented to the claim. | Upheld | — | £2,757 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £500 gross. | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,257
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.