Case 4103924/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Veena Siwach v Gorbals Retail Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4103924/2023
- Decision date
- 10 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Veena Siwach
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting in Glasgow via CVP on 9 October 2023 before Employment Judge R McPherson, upheld the claimant’s claim for unpaid holiday pay and awarded £1,603.60 gross. The judgment records that the respondent must make any lawful deductions for tax and national insurance from that sum, if applicable.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction of wages and awarded £834.60 net. In addition, it awarded £666.16 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 in respect of the respondent’s failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars.
The judgment states that the remaining claims were dismissed. No written reasons were requested, and oral reasons were given at the final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay succeeded; the award was stated to be gross of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,604 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deduction of wages succeeded; the award was stated as a net sum. | Upheld | — | £835 |
| Other | Award made under s.38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. | Upheld | — | £666 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,104
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.