Case 4103926/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Grandison v No appearance and No representation Saltire Facilities Management Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4103926/2023
- Decision date
- 16 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Grandison
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Grandison presented claims of unfair dismissal, failure to pay a redundancy payment, breach of contract and failure to pay holiday pay on 24 July 2023. The case was listed for a three-day final hearing, but the first day on 14 November 2023 was converted to an open preliminary hearing to consider whether the claim had been withdrawn and, if necessary, whether strike out was appropriate for failure to comply with tribunal orders.
The claimant did not appear. The tribunal noted that notice of hearing had been sent, the clerk had telephoned the claimant without response, and a message had been left. The tribunal also noted that on 27 July 2023 the claimant had emailed the ET1 submission 'do not reply' address stating: 'I would like to withdraw my claim'. Although the email had not immediately reached the administration team, the tribunal treated the wording as unequivocal. The claimant had been represented by the CAB at the time of the email, and that representation ended on 24 August 2023.
Applying Rule 51 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, the tribunal held that a claim withdrawn in writing comes to an end, and that once intimated a withdrawal cannot be retracted. The claimant had been directed to confirm by 13 November 2023 whether there was any reason the tribunal should not treat the email as a withdrawal, but no response was received.
The tribunal therefore concluded that there was nothing before it to suggest the withdrawal should not be actioned. The claims were dismissed under Rule 52. No merits findings were made and no monetary award was ordered.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under Rule 52 after the tribunal treated the claimant's 27 July 2023 email stating 'I would like to withdraw my claim' as an unequivocal withdrawal under Rule 51. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed under Rule 52 following the tribunal's finding that the claimant had withdrawn the claim by email on 27 July 2023. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed under Rule 52 following withdrawal; no merits determination was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed under Rule 52 following withdrawal; no separate remedy or liability finding was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 51
- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.