Case 4103941/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103941/2018 Miss C Fraser v Kenneth Andrew Wilson C/O Accountant in Bankruptcy — 2018
- Case reference
- 4103941/2018
- Decision date
- 21 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mary Kearns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103941/2018 Miss C Fraser
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss C Fraser was employed by Kenneth Andrew Wilson from 2 October 2017 until 31 January 2018, when her employment ended with that of the respondent's other employees. The respondent had been sequestrated, the action had been served on his trustee, and no ET3 was lodged, so the Employment Judge issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material.
The tribunal found that at termination the claimant remained owed 8 days' pay. On the figures accepted by the tribunal, she was paid £480.77 per week, or £96.15 per day, so the outstanding arrears of pay came to £769.20, rounded to £769. The judgment also found that she was due holiday pay for the period from 2 October 2017 to 31 January 2018, being 17 weeks, and calculated that entitlement at £880.18, rounded to £880.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,649. That sum represented the combined arrears of pay and holiday pay identified in the reasons. The judgment also noted that the claimant was required to account to HMRC for tax and National Insurance on the wage element.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The award was made up of £769 arrears of pay for 8 days and £880 holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,649 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,649
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.