Case 4103952/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103952/2024 Ms P Chuni Chaves v Mog Media UK Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 4103952/2024
- Decision date
- 18 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4103952/2024 Ms P Chuni Chaves
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found that MOG Media UK Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Ms P Chuni Chaves's wages.
The amount ordered was the gross sum of £3,937.50, described as the total of the deductions from the claimant's wages in November 2023. The judgment also permitted the respondent to deduct and account for any Income Tax and Employee National Insurance Contributions required by law, provided the balance was paid to the claimant with written evidence of any deductions and remittance to HMRC.
The hearing listed for 5 August 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment entered because no response was presented. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £3,937.50, described as the total deductions from the claimant's wages in November 2023. | Upheld | — | £3,938 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,938
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.