Case 4103958/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Munro v CSLS (Scotland) Ltd and 1 other — 2017
- Case reference
- 4103958/2016
- Decision date
- 6 June 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge FJ Garvie
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr G Munro
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the merits of any substantive claim. It recorded that, after case management correspondence on 28 March 2017 and 18 April 2017, the claimant was asked on 5 May 2017 to confirm whether he intended to proceed with the case.
The tribunal gave the claimant's representative an opportunity to provide written reasons by 19 May 2017 or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. No acceptable reason was provided and no hearing was requested.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive heads of claim. The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.