Case 4103960/2020 · Employment Tribunal
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case no 4103960/2020 Judgment issued without a Hearing under Rule Employment Judge: W A Meiklejohn Mrs K Gaciarz
The tribunal issued judgment without a hearing under Rule 60. It recorded that the claimant's ET15 claim form contained sufficient information, and that no ET3 response form was submitted by the respondent. The judgment therefore proceeded on the basis of the claim form and awarded the sums claimed there.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a statutory redundancy payment of £2,232, damages for breach of contract in respect of notice pay of £232, and holiday pay of £500.58. The notice pay award was calculated after deduction of the £2,000 stated in the claimant's ET1 to have been paid by the respondent.
The judgment also noted that the sums due in respect of notice pay and holiday pay may be subject to deduction of income tax and employee's National Insurance contributions, and that payment under those deductions would satisfy the awards. The total ordered by the tribunal was £2,964.58.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,232 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for notice pay were calculated after deducting £2,000 stated in the ET1 to have been paid by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £232 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded that this sum may be subject to deduction of income tax and employee's National Insurance contributions. | Upheld | — | £501 |
The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.