Case 4103976/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 4103976/2017 Ms C Hutchison as Executor of the Late Mrs E Hutchison v Glasgow City Council Cordia Services LLP — 2026
- Case reference
- 4103976/2017
- Decision date
- 28 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 4103976/2017 Ms C Hutchison as Executor of the Late Mrs E Hutchison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 38(1)(d). No substantive determination of the equal pay claim was recorded.
On 11 December 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant’s executor until 7 January 2026 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The executor did not provide an acceptable reason why a strike-out judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore stated that it must strike out the claim. No monetary remedy was awarded or addressed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The claim was struck out under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.