Case 4104001/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E McGrath v Represented by Mr B Mitchell - Lay Representative The Scottish Ministers — 2024
- Case reference
- 4104001/2024
- Decision date
- 2 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Mannion
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E McGrath
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented a claim on 8 March 2024 for unpaid holiday pay arising from annual leave taken between 21 and 25 August 2023. At the hearing, the respondent said the claimant had been paid his August 2023 salary of £3,088.56 on 31 August 2023 and that there had been no deduction from wages. The claimant's position was that annual leave had been recorded as 37 hours rather than rostered hours, leaving a deficit of 5.5 hours that might have to be worked later or deducted from final pay if not made up.
The tribunal treated the pleaded case as an unlawful deduction of wages claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It found that both parties accepted there had been no deduction from the claimant's pay in August 2023, so there were no disputed facts capable of supporting the claim. On that basis, and applying Rule 37(1)(a) and the cited strike-out authorities, the tribunal held that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success and granted the respondent's strike-out application.
The claimant also sought to amend the claim to allege that the annual leave recording policy breached the Working Time Directive and that he was not permitted to take leave, together with a breach of contract claim. The tribunal refused the amendment after applying the Selkent factors. It noted that no specific Working Time Directive provision had been identified, that the only possible annual leave complaint would be under regulation 30(1)(a) of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and that no refusal to permit leave had been identified. It also held that there was no jurisdiction to hear a breach of contract claim while the claimant remained employed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim pleaded as unpaid holiday pay / unlawful deduction of wages concerning annual leave taken from 21 to 25 August 2023. The tribunal found there had been no deduction from the claimant's August 2023 pay and struck the claim out under Rule 37(1)(a). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- Rule 37(1)(a) ET Rules
- HM Prison Service v Dolby
- Hassan v Tesco Stores Ltd
- Malik v Birmingham City Council
- Cox v Adecco Group UK & Ireland
- Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore
- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.