Case 4104033/2018 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: S/4104033/2018 Held at Inverness on and November 2018 Employment Judge: W A Meiklejohn Ms Kathryn Mary Hilton v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104033/2018
- Decision date
- 22 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alexander Meiklejohn
- Venue
- Inverness
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: S/4104033/2018 Held at Inverness on and November 2018 Employment Judge: W A Meiklejohn Ms Kathryn Mary Hilton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Ms Kathryn Mary Hilton brought a claim against Tesco Stores Limited and appeared in person. The respondent was represented by counsel.
The written judgment states that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed by the respondent and that her claim of constructive unfair dismissal was dismissed. The judgment records that reasons were delivered orally at the hearing, but it does not set out those reasons in the written text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed and that her claim of constructive unfair dismissal was dismissed. Reasons were delivered orally and no further reasoning is included in the written judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.