Case 4104076/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104076/2022 Mr A Wallace v Crowdsense Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4104076/2022
- Decision date
- 13 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Claire McManus
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4104076/2022 Mr A Wallace
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. The Employment Judge decided the case without a hearing and cancelled the hearing listed for 5 October 2022.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered Crowdsense Ltd to pay £1,986.08 net. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,713, calculated as 3 weeks' pay at the statutory cap of £571 per week.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,986.08 net. | Upheld | — | £1,986 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,713, described as 3 weeks' pay at the statutory cap of £571 per week. | Upheld | — | £1,713 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,699
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.