Case 4104087/2020 · Employment Tribunal
N McCulloch v Orems Care Services Asonta Hailstones — 2021
- Case reference
- 4104087/2020
- Decision date
- 16 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Campbell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
N McCulloch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, N McCulloch, was employed by Orems Care Services Asonta Hailstones as a Support Worker from 16 April 2018 until 27 April 2020. The dispute narrowed to whether the respondent unlawfully deducted wages by not paying her for the period from 20 to 27 April 2020. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was willing and able to work during that period, that she had resigned on 20 April 2020 giving one week's notice, and that she was not paid any wages for the period covered by her notice.
The tribunal found that, although it was not fully clear from the evidence whether the claimant would have been entitled to pay in a week when she did not work, the claimant's contract required her to work in order to be paid under ordinary circumstances. However, because she had given notice of termination, section 88(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 applied. On the evidence, she was ready and willing to work throughout the week commencing 20 April 2020 and also between 25 and 27 April 2020, so she should have been paid for her normal working hours for that period.
The tribunal accepted the parties' agreed gross figure of £216 for one week's pay and noted that a payslip showed employee National Insurance of £4.02 on that amount. It therefore ordered payment of £211.98 to place the claimant in the position she would have been in had she been paid the correct amount. The judgment records no other monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was narrowed to non-payment of wages for 20 to 27 April 2020. The tribunal held that section 88(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 applied during the claimant's notice period and that she should have been paid for that week. | Upheld | — | £212 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £212
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 88(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.