Case 4104094/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4104094/2022 Miss P Dzieciol v Maritime and Coastguard Agency — 2022
- Case reference
- 4104094/2022
- Decision date
- 23 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4104094/2022 Miss P Dzieciol
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal (Scotland) struck out Miss P Dzieciol's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The stated grounds were non-compliance with a tribunal order dated 2 December 2022 under rule 37(1)(c), and that the claim had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d).
The tribunal recorded that on 31 October 2022 the claimant was asked to provide further and better particulars, referenced in paragraph 4 of the note of the preliminary hearing held on 20 September 2022 and dated 22 September 2022, and the Scott Schedule referred to in paragraph 5 of that note. No reply was received. A further reminder was sent by email on 22 November 2022, again without reply.
An unless order was then issued on 2 December 2022 requiring the information to be provided and warning that the claim would be struck out if no response was received by 9 December 2022. The tribunal found that the claimant failed to respond, and on that basis struck out the claim. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not identify the underlying cause of action in the text provided. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(c) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.