Case 4104124/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. Michelle Clarke, Executor of v The late Mr Thomas Clarke (dec’d) Represented by: Mr S Smith - Solicitor Cardinal Security Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4104124/2017
- Decision date
- 18 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rory McPherson
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. Michelle Clarke, Executor of
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the late Mr Thomas Clarke was made redundant by Cardinal Security Ltd, which was in administration. The hearing proceeded with the written consent of the Joint Administrator, Allan Graham of Duff & Phelps Ltd, and the respondent did not appear or take part in the hearing.
On that basis, the claimant's claim for a redundancy payment succeeded. The tribunal awarded £8,976.00, calculated by reference to the claimant's 17 years' service.
The tribunal also held that pay in lieu of notice was due and awarded £3,564.00, said to represent 12 weeks' pay in lieu of notice. The total sum awarded was therefore £12,540.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was made redundant and awarded a statutory redundancy payment based on 17 years' service. | Upheld | — | £8,976 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal also awarded 12 weeks' pay in lieu of notice. | Upheld | — | £3,564 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,540
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.